*Warning: The following contains spoilers for Battlefield 3*
I know DICE is a multiplayer orientated video game developer but I had high hopes for their single player component for Battlefield 3. After playing and enjoying the campaign from Battlefield: Bad Company 2 I expected that they would follow suit with an outing that was equally emotional, with lots of action, good characters and a gripping tail. Granted Bad Company 2 wasn’t the genre defining story and will not win any literary rewards but it made the campaign worth playing through.
Battlefield 3′s single player campaign is nothing more than a glorified tech demo for the Frostbite 2 engine. It is as if EA and DICE created this new technology and instead of asking themselves “What sort of story can we tell with this?” they asked themselves “How can we show this off?”. Like a toddler in the playground with the newest toy, they waved the Frostbite 2 engine around in everyone’s faces but did not really know how to play with it.
The story itself is typical of modern warfare shooters which really has become none existent or background noise. There is a nuclear weapon, something about middle eastern bad guys, and oh guess what, the Russians are involved! Its too bad the mission design and levels did not reflect this poorly put together story but rather were made to show off. DICE needed to show that there are Tanks in the game, so we get a whole mission about that. Same with Jets, building destruction and one too many close up fist fights.
That is my biggest complaint with the entire single player campaign. What I mean is that you as the player are not really playing but rather watching an interactive cutscene. You’re tasked with killing some bad guys here and there but most of the time you’re following an on screen marker to a destination just 20 feet away, pressing buttons when the game tells you to and watching the explosions and action scenes.

